Autopsy Report Contradicts Jordie Chandler's Description | The Official Michael Jackson Site
forum

Autopsy Report Contradicts Jordie Chandler's Description

All:

We all know that in 1993, Michael was subjected to a humiliating body search. We have never been told the entire truth of the results of that search.

The body search took place on December 20, 1993. Prior to the body search, Mr. Jackson’s attorneys were not given a copy of the affidavit indicating the reason for “probable cause.” At the time of the search, Michael’s attorney, Howard Weitzman requested a copy. It has been reported that in response to the request, Detective Russ Birchim of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office, stated,“I don’t think so.” Weitzman laughed and said,“[i]t never hurts to try.” The affidavit is available at TSG--Tellale Splotch.

Michael Jackson requested that everyone leave the room except his physician, Dr. Arnold Klein, his personal photographer, Louis Swayne, Sergeant Gary Spiegel, the sheriff’s office photographer and the DA’s dermatologist, Dr. Richard Strick.

The first aspect of the body examination that contradicted Jordie’s descriptive affidavit and drawing was the issue of whether Michael Jackson was circumcised. Evan Chandler was Jewish and his son was still a mere thirteen (13) years old when the affidavit and drawing were created. It is possible that having been circumcised himself, he had not thought of the possibility that a poor, black child born in Indiana in 1958 would not have been circumcised. In either case, it is simply not possible that someone who provided a detailed affidavit and drawing in which circumcision is expressly identified, would have missed so critical a fact if he had actually seen Michael Jackson’s penis. However, as confirmed during the body search and noted by Dr. Strick, Michael Jackson was not circumcised.

In October 2009, Geraldo interviewed Dr. Strick who said,“the genitalia were very oddly colored with dark skin and light skin and I was told later that the description and the photos that were taken absolutely matched what the child had described.” Since there were only two doctors in the room, Dr. Strick and Dr. David Forecast, Dr. Strick was there to make the determination on behalf of the sheriff’s office. The fact that Dr. Strick admitted that he was told that there was a match confirmed that he did not make the determination and contradicted media reports that he had made such a determination. The question remains: who determined that there was a similarity?

The recent release of the autopsy report confirmed that at the time of his death, Michael Jackson was uncircumcised.

Jordie Chandler is a LIAR.

Comments (27)

A brand new fan bringing up a year old topic? With a contradictory statement regarding the facts? Your arguement will go nowhere here we do not debate people troling fan sites for the pleasure of hurting the other fans. Go be your little cyberbully self somwhere else you have been reported as offensive

IMPORTANT MSG for all the WORLD about M.J. -----> LET'S ASK TOGETHER TO CHANGE THE CHARGES FOR dr. MURREY

Brian Oxman, Joe Jackson’s attorney and M. Jackson confidante for the past 23 years, along with Kathryn Milofsky, who works closely with Brian Oxman on Michael Jackson related projects, were overwhelmed by the great support shown by Michael Jackson fans who attended the
"MICHAEL JACKSON EUROPEAN CONVENTION",
organized by MJPortal.com and the Legend Music Awards on 14/2/10 in Milan (ITALY).
*****
When Brian spoke to Joe Jackson, he was exited to hear so many people were already on board to get the charges changed from involuntary manslaughter to Murder 2. It has given him an inner strength to carry on with his personal fight for justice for his son. He personally thanks you for your love and prayers for his family.
*****
It was exiting for us to talk to all the fans on Sunday in Milan, hear your personal stories of Michael and your perspective on where we go from here.
We have just started the
“Campaign to Change the Charges”
and all the Italian fans have led the way in the fight for Justice for Michael.
Brian Oxman says “Second Degree murder applies to a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life Michael’s death was the result of utter recklessness on the morning of the 25th of June 2009. Justice .
----> No respect was shown for the life of Michael Jackson.
*****
*****
-----> Please call the L.A. District Attorney Steve Cooley (PHONE 001.213.974.3512)
or write him an email to: scooley@da.lacounty.gov
(this e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it)
and
ASK HIM, FOR THE TRUTH AND THE JUSTICE IN THE MICHAEL JACKSON CASE,
TO CHANGE THE CHARGES AGAINST DOCTOR CONRAD MURRAY INTO:
"MURDER 2nd DEGREE"
for the negligence that the doctor has shown and the lack of concern for human life of Michael Jackson.
Because the guilty should pay for their just penalty for theirs crime.
*****
here an exempleof the text:
________________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Prosecutor,
hereby I formally request to you,
FOR THE TRUTH AND THE JUSTICE IN THE MICHAEL JACKSON CASE,

TO CHANGE THE CHARGES AGAINST DOCTOR CONRAD MURREY INTO:

"MURDER 2nd DEGREE"

also for the negligence that the doctor has shown and the lack of concern for human life of Michael Jackson.
Because the guilty should pay for their just penalty for theirs crime.

Hoping that you will consider this request, with respect I sending obsequious greetings.

.....+ name, surname
______________________________________________________________________
*****
Please, all of you, send the e-mail to the Attorney, + copy all the text with the italian one under here, too (translate it in other language) and send it to all your friends for spread the word in all the world by doing it to turn it every day (by e-mail + any social network like: facebook, my space, twitter, forum + ....).
Our voice will be heard and justice done. Michael deserves it and is waiting for it!
God bless all

§§§§§§§§§§
look here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbGrrNyMpZY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWQd6je_BFk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQmZfKpQXK8&feature=fvsr

***********************************---> italian version:
Brian Oxman, l'avvocato di Joe Jackson e confidente / consulente legale di M.J. negli ultimi 23 anni, insieme a Kathryn Milofsky, che lavora a stretto contatto con Oxman su alcuni importanti progetti di difesa di Michael, sono stati sopraffatti dal grande sostegno dimostrato dai fan di Michael Jackson che hanno partecipato alla
"MICHAEL JACKSON EUROPEAN CONVENTION",
organizzata da MJPortal.com e Legend Music Awards dom. 14/2/10 a Milano.
*****
Oxman ha parlato telefonicamente con Joe Jackson dopo la Convention, ed ha riferito che è stato colpito di sentire che così tante persone erano pronte a supportare la campagna per aggravare le accuse contro il dr. Murrey per ottenere che l'incriminazone passi da omicidio colposo a OMICIDIO di 2°. Ciò gli ha dato una forza interiore per continuare la sua battaglia personale per la giustizia per suo figlio. Ha ringraziato per l'amore e la preghiera per la sua famiglia.
*****
"E' stato veramente grandioso parlare con tutti i fans domenica a Milano, ascoltare le vostre storie personali su Michael e comprendere anche i vostri punti di vista, ha detto Oxman. Abbiamo lanciato la
“Campaign to Change the Charges”
…campagna x cambiare le accuse
proprio al vostro evento e tutti i fans devono impegnarsi in questo importante progetto affinche' Michael possa avere giustizia".
*****
Oxman è convinto, come tutti, che le accuse contro Murray debbano essere innalzate a “Omicidio di 2° grado" per la negligenza che il medico ha mostrato e per la mancanza di preoccupazione per la vita umana di Michael Jackson che è stata dimostrata.
Perché i colpevoli devono pagare la loro giusta pena per i loro reati.
----> Vogliamo Giustizia. La vita di Michael Jackson non è stata rispettata !
*****
*****
-----> Si prega di chiamare il procuratore distrettuale di Los Angeles: Steve Cooley (TELEFONO 001.213.974.3512)
o scrivere una mail a: scooley@da.lacounty.gov
(questo indirizzo e-mail è protetto dallo spam bot. abilitare Javascript per vederlo)
e
chiedetegli, per la verità e la giustizia nel caso MICHAEL JACKSON,
DI CAMBIARE LE ACCUSE CONTRO MEDICO CONRAD MURRAY IN:
"OMICIDIO DI 2 ° grado"
per la negligenza che ha dimostrato il medico e la mancanza di preoccupazione e rispetto per la vita umana di Michael Jackson.
Perché i colpevoli devono pagare loro la giusta pena per i loro reati.
___________________________________________________________
ecco 1 esempio di testo:
Dear Mr. Prosecutor,
hereby I formally request to you,
FOR THE TRUTH AND THE JUSTICE IN THE MICHAEL JACKSON CASE,

TO CHANGE THE CHARGES AGAINST DOCTOR CONRAD MURREY INTO:

"MURDER 2nd DEGREE"

also for the negligence that the doctor has shown and the lack of concern for human life of Michael Jackson.
Because the guilty should pay for their just penalty for theirs crime.

Hoping that you will consider this request, with respect I sending obsequious greetings.

.....+ nominativo firma
___________________________________________________________
*****
Per favore, tutti voi, inviate l'e-mail al Procuratore, + copiate tutto il testo anche quello sotto in inglese (e/o traducetelo in altre lingue) per inviarlo a tutti i vostri amici. Fate il passa-parola in tutto il mondo facendolo girare sempre(via e-mail + eventuali social network come: Facebook, Myspace, twitter, forum + ....).
La nostra voce sarà ascoltata e fatta giustizia.
Michael lo merita ed è in attesa di questo!
GOD BLESS ALL
§§§§§§§§§§
guardate qui:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbGrrNyMpZY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWQd6je_BFke
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQmZfKpQXK8&feature=fvsr

I couldn't agree more. Evan Chandler was amoral. I don't have a degree in psychology but I have worked in psychiatric nursing and I think the man was a sociopath. Every move they make is based on self desire. I think he killed himself because Michael Jackson was dead and he could never figure out a way to sue him again. Sociopathsmake up about 95% of the prison population in this country because they commit crimes without conscience and instead of Mchael being on trial it should have been him.When you get money from somebody the way they did it is the same as stealing. The only thing I can think of that is good about that man is he is finally dead and I can bet he didn't go to heaven,

patriciank: I have every right to respond to your post so I am.Posts that lack balance,mental and emotional are red-flags that make my skin crawl.It is time to grow up and accept some truths of life--acting emotionally will only make you look silly, and unbelievable. You have the right to believe,incorrectly,in what you do but you do not have the right to denigrate others,others who just may not only be older,wiser,but experienced in the study of human behavior, a science called psychology.Evan Chandler was amoral,that is,without morals.He didn't care about anyone else,just himself.He did not feel any guilt,drawing his own son into his lies;he had no compunctions about drugging his own son to implant false memories.He had no feelings of guilt because he wasn't capable of those feelings.Michael was set up by this grifter.Michael's reputation was besmirched by Chandler and the tabloid-based media,who are equally unbalanced in their thinking and perspective as well.But fans acting unbalanced and irrational only fuel the fire of the tabloid media,the Diane Dimonds of the world;they call unbalanced,unthinking fans crazy and unwilling to see things clearly--ironic,because the same thing can be said of the biased media.It does everyone good to be balanced,thoughtful,rational and FACTUAL. NO ONE can prove that Evan Chandler committed suicide because of guilt or illness,but can only suppose what happened based on past behavior.

Evan Chandler was an extortionist.Jordan lied for his father because he loved him.Kids love their parents whether they are good people or not. I read an article online that said that Michael was quoted as saying he did not know why he would do it. Anyway thats the answer Jordan loved his father and did what he wanted.I doubt if he will ever step up and tell the truth he has already had enough time and plenty of chances.By now he is just like his father and nothing he does will redeem him in my book. One of the most wonderful creatures ever born is gone and he and his father were the beginning of the end of Michael. Michael said to never hate but in this case I have my own feelings and I hate him.Sorry Michael I might try to work on it but I won't spend a lot of time on it.

I don't think that he killed himself due to guilt or remorse, but more because people the world over were now interested in learning the truth about the allegations. Before long, he would have been exposed. The fact that this guy, who claimed to have so much to say about Michael Jackson, did not leave a suicide note, speaks volumes to me.

Evan Chandler did NOT kill himself because of guilt;he was trying to escape the pain of his fatal illness.Chandler had no moral compunctions what-so-ever.He was a grifter,a conartist without morals.If his son has any moral background or a scintilla of character,he would see what kind of man his father was and realize that his own father was guilty of abuse.

The proof isn't for us. And some people will just assume he was guilty despite the evidence proving otherwise, like those who thought the jury was "blinded by his celebrity" and that he "got away with it"... so the proof isn't really for them either because they don't care about the truth. The proof is for those who fall in the middle. While many people who <em>seriously </em>followed the trial could see that the Arvizos were grifters and the allegations against Michael were preposterous, a large percentage still believe that Michael paid Chandler off to silence him. The news that two grand juries did not indict got swept under the rug. What people remember are the blaring headlines coming from every news outlet that Chandler could identify Michael's genitalia, and that soon after the body search, the civil case was settled. So this information that proves Chandler never saw him is important in terms the general public knowing that the allegation was false.

This is NOT shocking... I think Evan Chandler killed himself because he knew that the truth would come out with the death and autopsy of Michael's body. I hope the Jackson family is reading this.... EXPOSE the Chandlers for the manipulative, money hungry LIARS that they are! I know Jordie was a kid during all this but he's an adult now... GO AFTER HIS MOTHER who agreed with Evan 's plan of extortion!!!!!!!!!

MJJM

Of course Jordie and Arvizio are liars. I know this for a fact.My belief in Michael's innocence has been constant from day one. I don't need any proof of his innocence,I simply know he is innocent.

His description didn't match. This was a problem with the grand jury and why they refused to bring charges

of course chandler is a lier, lier and his bum is on fire....dont you guys in the us of a, have the ol false and milicious allegations in your criminal system??

90 per cent people arout Mike were liars and misusing him. I am more and more sick from that. And so sorry that there was no way out.
Only positive ourcome I see is, that eyes of many people opened - I hope so.

Michael didn't settle the case, his insurance companies did. Insurance companies settle cases based on what benefits the insurance company not the defendent. People that dispute Michaels innocence continue to win any argument they have by nitpicking. All of the things they say are not fact they are questions that they have thought of to form their opinion and that is the opinion they want to have. They are nasty and difficult to deal with but I tell you you are never going to win with some of them.The difference between them and us is that they go on the offensive. They instigate an argument not necessarity because theybelieve it but because they like the attention of an argument.The best way to deal with them is to say. I have tried in the past to make people understand that this matter has already gone to court and Michael Jackson was found not guilty. If you have evidence that the jury did not see I would like you to show it to me, otherwise just shut up.Sometimes the best way to win an argument is to stop it and declare yourself the winner.

You are so right; Michael would have settled before the search if he was indeed guilty!
I am so frustrated that Michael wasn't given a fair break in this entire fiasco;the media was hell-bent on portraying this man as strange and unwholesome.Any news that points to Michael's innocence is ignored.

@Lyande

What kills me about these delusional Michael Jackson haters is that "not guilty" does not mean innocent and only guilty people settle law suits. Neither is true. Unlike many celebrity trials that we've all seen, in 2005 a great deal of evidence was allowed into the trial. Therefore, this was not a situation where crafty lawyers kept incriminating evidence out. rather, everything came in and the jury didn't buy it.

As for the settlement, I can tell you that there are tons of reasons to settle cases including attorney incompetence, cost-benefit analysis, vacation schedules of attorneys conflicting with trial schedules. I know that this may sound crazy, but I've seen it all happen.

What I want to know is, if he was guilty, why wouldn't Michael have settled before the body search instead of after? If the description could have matched why wouldn't Michael have tried to avoid the whole thing? Clearly it because he, like so many other defendants thought that by showing the DA and sheriff's office that the description did not match, would cause the DA to drop their case.

Diane Dimond as a source for unbiased information? She would just say that of course the splotches don't match because vitligo and/or skin bleaching caused the differences,not wanting to admit that it is she and the Chandlers who are mistaken and/or lying.
The mere fact that Michael was uncircumcised points to this whole episode as being made up.There is a big difference between a circumcised and uncircumcised penis;Jordie did not describe Michael's genitalia because he did not have such an up-close look like he said he did.He lied about the molestation because his father put him up to it,feeding him suggestions while he was sedated.Evan Chandler was the child abuser,here,not Michael.

I think that the autopsy report exonerates Michael of a lot of things that were said about him over the years. We all knew Michael wasn't guilty of the child molestation charges in 1993 and he was found not guilty if all the charges in 2005. I have been reading some of comments on different sites such as you tube from the people that continue to support their reality of Michael being a child molester. They have no proven facts in any of their arguments. Whenever they are confronted with the not guilty verdicts they say that a not guilty verdict does not mean innocent.Yes it does. They argue that not guilty is a gray area meaning the same thing as no contest. Not true. Not guilty means innocent look it up in a legal dictionary. These are people that continuously twist the meaning of the words in the law to suit their own opinions, which is just what they are. We have legal proof that he was not guilty, found for us by a jury in a court of law. They can continue to site evidence that was introduced in court as pornography but they must be reminded that a jury has already seen all of the prosecutions evidence and still the verdict was not guilty.They say that the boys were telling the truth. No they weren't, the jury didn't think so.When theysay things like this they are giving the jury system no credit whatsoever. Do they think that all 12 of those jurors were stupid people easily swayed by celebrity?Do they think that Tom Sneddon would have allowed the 12 jurors chosen by him and the defence to be all Michael Jackson fans? I don't think so.Do they know that they choose 12 and 4 alternates out of about 250 people in a jury pool to be on a particular jury?
As for Jordan Chandler he had the opportunity to testify in the 2003 trial and said that he would sue Santa Barbara County and the federal government if they forced him to.He said he had already done enough.That was from the FBI when the SBADA went with the FBI to interview him. What that means can also be spun to mean that he felt he had done enough to Michael Jackson and wanted no part in the fabricated mess that Tom Sneddon and a few close friends in the media (one Diane Dimond to be sure) made up about Michael.He was also afraid of cross examination because he could have taken the case to criminal court any time in the 7 years before the statute of limitations ran out on it.
I suggest we take a new tact with people like this. Instead of trying to prove Michael inoocent because he already has been make them prove him guilty if they can because Tom Sneddon couldn't and he had a lot of help. When they cite anything don't reply with emotion reply with the one most important fact. Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY on counts 1-10 and the 4 lesser charges on June 13th 2005. Make them show us what they have and prove his guilt to us because a jury has already found him NOT GUILTY/Innocent of the charges including rule 1108 evidence which is past acts.If they still want to think he is gulity fine but make them PUT UP or SHUT UP. I want to see THEIR evidence.

On the issue of the splotch, there was actually no evidence. Oddly, the source of that information is none other than Diane Dimond. Jordie described a splotch on the underside of Michael's scrotum. Therefore, a photographer was taken to the body search. According to Diane Dimond though, no pictures were taken of any such splotch. The photographer later claimed that he observed such a splotch, but was unable to photograph such a splotch.

I think that when you take into account the acts alleged by Jordie, had anything of the sort actually occurred, he would have been able to make an accurate description. At the end of the day, all that it appears he was able to describe is Michael's vitiligo.

I too have heard the Taymoor story, but I also don't think it's true. There is no indication that June Chandler supported her husband's claims of abuse. Therefore, I don't think that she would have been involved in a set up as suggested in that story. I think that it was probably someone trying to help Michael after the fact.

On the issue of the splotch, there was actually no evidence. Oddly, the source of that information is none other than Diane Dimond. Jordie described a splotch on the underside of Michael's scrotum. Therefore, a photographer was taken to the body search. According to Diane Dimond though, no pictures were taken of any such splotch. The photographer later claimed that he observed such a splotch, but was unable to photograph such a splotch.

I think that when you take into account the acts alleged by Jordie, had anything of the sort actually occurred, he would have been able to make an accurate description. At the end of the day, all that it appears he was able to describe is Michael's vitiligo.

I too have heard the Taymoor story, but I also don't think it's true. There is no indication that June Chandler supported her husband's claims of abuse. Therefore, I don't think that she would have been involved in a set up as suggested in that story. I think that it was probably someone trying to help Michael after the fact.

Everything I've read, regarding this, said that while there were similarities it was not an exact match. I think I did read somewhere once where there the child had made a reference to a particular brown patch on the underside, which was indeed present - but have no idea if this is true. But like others have said, Jordie stated Michael was circumcised when he indeed was not. As far as the vitiligo - if Jordie saw patches on Michaels face, arms, hands, legs - I'm sure at least Evan was smart enough to assume the patches would be present over the entirety of Michael's body.

Lisa and Venay - INDEED, we have a liar on our hands with blood on his - namely, the 30-ish Mr. Jordan Chandler.

Lyn - that propofol in the stomach contents is so disturbing to me. As Nancy Grace said this past Mon. night (and she's actually pro prosecution of CM to the fullest extent of the law), Michael was "swimming" in propofol.

IJCS

Venay - I've read that pool story before and I personally think it sounds fabricated. I believe that story was made up by someone trying to defend Michael because they thought Jordan's description matched. But his description did NOT match. It doesn't make sense that the boy peeked in at Michael while he was showering and saw blotches on his foreskin but he didn't see the foreskin. The story also contradicts Mary Fischer's article. The story suggests that both Jordan and his mother were in on the extortion plot, and that they started scheming before Michael went on tour in June 1992. But Mary Fischer's well-researched investigative report states that Jordan repeatedly denied his father's allegations against Michael. Before Aug 1993, the only one making the accusations was Evan. It was only after Evan took control of his son and gave him the sodium Amytal that Jordan made the false accusations.
.
.
In August 1993, when the allegation was made, even I could have given the same vague, general description that Jordan made about discolored blotches on Michael's genitalia. In February 1993, Michael revealed to the entire world in the Oprah interview that he had a skin disorder which destroys the pigment, leaving blotches on his skin, and that it had started in the early-to-mid 80s. The following day, his doctor, with Michael's consent, revealed the name of the disorder, Vitiligo, and discussed the condition. The media ran with this topic as details of the disease and photographs of Vitiligo patients spread across television, newspapers and magazines. That week, I learned that the disease is progressive and typically begins around the fingers, toes, eyes, mouth and genitalia. Evan Chandler obviously saw the same stories and pictures I saw did. And as a dentist, Chandler would have also had access to medical journals documenting the disease. Chandler knew Michael's rare skin disorder would be the perfect selling point for his extortion scheme.

The claim by authorities that there was a match in some characteristics is not credible. All men have the same general characteristics and Jordan's description did not match in the most obvious and distinct identifiable trait. Jordan not only said Michael was circumcised, but he also described a circumcised penis. Even his absurdly vague drawing is wrong. He never saw him.

Proof that Jordan Chandler lied is now on public record. Why is this not getting any coverage in the media?. I haven't seen a single news report revealing this fact, but I have seen countless stories using other private and personal information from the autopsy report to pick Michael apart.

I have a picture of the " drawing" that Jordan supposedly submitted to the police.The drawing itself should have also been in question as it was done by evan ( by his own admission) saying that Jordan was describing it to him. It was also done after they served the search warrants and had the photos. The autopsy should also put an end to many of the other "stories" about Michael. One forinstance was the story about numerous surgeries he had on his face. If there had been implants in his cheeks and chin they would have been listed in the radiology report. The scars he did have listed were consistant with skin grafting of his scalp following the severe burn during the Pepsi commercial.
What I can tell you from the toxicology reports that this man gave him an awful lot of propofol. It was found in every tissue in his body including his stomach contents. For the drug to be found in his stomach contents he would have had to give him about 500 ccs or more of propofol or pour it down his throat.
He was not a long term demerol user as has been suggested because he had minimal fatty deposits on his liver. He did have an enlarged prostate which tells us that he was a 50 year old black male, and I think we all knew that.He also had mild or minimal calcificate of his basal ganglia in his brain which also means he was 50 years old.
Everything in the autopsy report supports the fact that Dr. Murray killed Michael Jackson with the administration of propofol outside the hospital setting. He does deserve to go to jail much longer than 4 years but I will take what I can get because I seriously doubt he will live out his incarceration.

Lisa, I'm unaware who made the determination but could Taymoor Marmarchi's account explain why Jordy's description was claimed to have matched the photographs?

<em.>On one of my trips to Neverland, a Mexican worker who took care of the grounds of Michael's main residence, confided to me in Spanish and shared a fascinating story that both shocked and clarified how people in Michael Jackson's life take advantage, manipulate, twist the truth and create malicious lies about him, all for the sake of money.</em>

<em.>The worker began to whisper to me, afraid he may be overheard and questioned why he was revealing such confidential yet incredibly important information that must be shared with the rest of the world.</em>

<em.>He began telling me that one day back in '92/'93 before Michael's heavy scheduled 'Dangerous' Tour, there was a bbq and swimming pool party that Michael hosted for a group of friends, both youngsters and adults at Neverland.</em>

<em.>After a couple of hours, Michael got out of the pool and went to shower and dry off. The worker noticed that a young boy also excused himself from the pool after Michael. He went to look for him and followed him to discover that the boy was in the bathroom where Michael was showering. Not in the shower with him, but rather shockingly spying and scanning Michael's naked body through the shower, from a corner of the bathroom. The worker immediately shouted at him and asked, 'What the hell are you doing up here?' Michael heard the worker yell, discovered the boy in his bathroom and told him to take the boy back down to the pool, thinking nothing of it.</em>

<em.>When the boy returned to the pool he glanced over at his mother, who was present and sunbathing by the pool, and gave her a sign of acknowledgement, as if he had accomplished whatever he set out to do. In fact, the worker said that he had seen the woman signal to her son that Michael had left the pool, as an indication to exit.</em>

<em.>That same boy later claimed in Aug '93, that Michael Jackson had sexually molested him, his name was Jordie Chandler.</em>

<em.>Chandler infamously told police vivid details of how Michael Jackson's genitalia appeared, as a certain guarantee to the world, that Michael must have been guilty of these hienous accusations.</em>

<em.>Of course he knew how to describe the different skin shades and colour blemishes in Michael's private parts, he was spying on him in the shower that day to prepare for an incredible extortion attempt for millions of dollars, meticulously and carefully planned by a family of professional con artists and scammers.</em>

<strong.>Taken from "Reflections on the Dance"....this story was shared by Taymoor Marmarchi, who worked on humanitarian projects for Michael Jackson</strong>